Big Thompson State of the Watershed Reports

Big Thomson Watershed, CO

Big Thompson Watershed Forum selected Hydros to develop State of the Watershed reports in 2010, 2015, and 2021. The analysis included database QAQC, developing a conceptual understanding of the drivers of water-quality across the watershed, summarizing current water-quality patterns, evaluating changes in water quality over time through statistical trend testing, and comparing data to applicable Colorado water-quality standards. To support development of a detailed conceptual understanding, information on underlying geology, land use, population density, wastewater effluent, and water management (diversions and managed inflows) were compiled in addition to the observed water-quality data.

Parameters in the analysis included flow rates, metals (arsenic, copper, cadmium, lead, selenium, and zinc), nutrients (ammonia, nitrate+nitrite, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and orthophosphate), microbiological parameters (total coliforms and E. coliforms), and a group of general parameters (alkalinity, dissolved oxygen, hardness, pH, specific conductivity, sulfate, temperature, total organic carbon, and total suspended solids).

Reports detailing the findings of the analyses for each five-year update were created in 2010, 2015, and 2021. Each report included an executive summary written to support communication of results to all stakeholders.  Key findings included:

  • Identification of increasing trends in nutrient and total organic carbon concentrations in the Little Thompson River that appear to coincide with the recent population growth;

  • Clear characterization of the water quality effects of trans-basin inflows from the Colorado-Big Thompson project;

  • Evaluation of the observed effects of 2013 flooding, road reconstruction activities, and major wildfires on water quality in the watershed;

  • Distinction between the upper and lower watersheds in terms of issues relative to water-quality standards, including the roles of geology and land use; and

  • Recommendations related to data gaps in the existing sampling program to better support future data assessments.